Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #28307Re: FullWrite Professional
From: Chuq Von Rospach
Date: Thu, 19 May 1988 16:07
Date: Thu, 19 May 1988 16:07
18 lines
1196 bytes
1196 bytes
>There is no way that a "state-of-the-art" word processor needs more than a
>megabyte of memory on the Mac. Properly segmented, FWP should be able to
>run on a one meg Mac Plus.
Um, hate to sound snotty, but how do you know this? Have you, for instance,
implemented one?
It's very possible that this might be true. But I wouldn't taken it for a
given. There may well be very good reasons why the FullWrite code is the way
it is. There are some programs that I've seen that simply can't segment
cleanly. And there may be other factors you aren't aware of.
Chuq Von Rospach chuq@sun.COM Delphi: CHUQ
Robert A. Heinlein: 1907-1988. He will never truly die as long as we
read his words and speak his name. Rest in Peace.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<53834@sun.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!amdcad!sun!plaid!chuqReferences:
<53610@sun.uucp> <1713@pt.cs.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!amdcad!sun!plaid!chuq From: chuq@plaid.Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: FullWrite Professional Message-ID: <53834@sun.uucp> Date: 19 May 88 16:07:33 GMT References: <53610@sun.uucp> <1713@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Sender: news@sun.uucp Reply-To: chuq@sun.UUCP (Chuq Von Rospach) Distribution: na Organization: Fictional Reality Lines: 17