🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #294

Word 4.0 & fonts

#294
From: Kelvin Thompson
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1989 01:54
29 lines
1579 bytes
A few days ago I posted a nag about Word 4.0 not doing fonts correctly.
Several people replied that I could save documents in RTF format
for transferring between different Mac's.

I've now got a few questions about RTF:

  [1]  Somewhere I got the idea that RTF is an ascii file format,
       and hence devours hugely more space than an equivalent native
       document.  True?

  [2]  Does the RTF format -- whether ascii or binary -- truly carry
       *all* the information about a document?  Graphics?  Styles?
       Pagination?  Imbedded Postscript?  And is all this editable
       when you read the RTF file?

       If the RTF format can describe everything the native format
       does, and in roughly the same amount of space, it seems sort
       of redundant.  If Microsoft was to go add more features to
       Word, they'd have to change the spec for RTF, which seems to
       violate the reasons for having a public file format in the
       first place (i.e. providing a stationary target).

  [3]  Do RTF files take any longer to save or load?

E-mail to me and I'll summarize.

-- 
-- Kelvin Thompson, Lone Rider of the Apocalypse
   kelvin@cs.utexas.edu  {...,uunet}!cs.utexas.edu!kelvin
Technical Details
Message-ID: <641@dagora.cs.utexas.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!kelvin

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!kelvin
From: kelvin@cs.utexas.edu (Kelvin Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Word 4.0 & fonts
Keywords: Word MicroSoft fonts RTF
Message-ID: <641@dagora.cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 17 Jun 89 01:54:50 GMT
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 29