Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #294Word 4.0 & fonts
From: Kelvin Thompson
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1989 01:54
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1989 01:54
29 lines
1579 bytes
1579 bytes
A few days ago I posted a nag about Word 4.0 not doing fonts correctly.
Several people replied that I could save documents in RTF format
for transferring between different Mac's.
I've now got a few questions about RTF:
[1] Somewhere I got the idea that RTF is an ascii file format,
and hence devours hugely more space than an equivalent native
document. True?
[2] Does the RTF format -- whether ascii or binary -- truly carry
*all* the information about a document? Graphics? Styles?
Pagination? Imbedded Postscript? And is all this editable
when you read the RTF file?
If the RTF format can describe everything the native format
does, and in roughly the same amount of space, it seems sort
of redundant. If Microsoft was to go add more features to
Word, they'd have to change the spec for RTF, which seems to
violate the reasons for having a public file format in the
first place (i.e. providing a stationary target).
[3] Do RTF files take any longer to save or load?
E-mail to me and I'll summarize.
--
-- Kelvin Thompson, Lone Rider of the Apocalypse
kelvin@cs.utexas.edu {...,uunet}!cs.utexas.edu!kelvin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<641@dagora.cs.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!kelvinShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!kelvin From: kelvin@cs.utexas.edu (Kelvin Thompson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Word 4.0 & fonts Keywords: Word MicroSoft fonts RTF Message-ID: <641@dagora.cs.utexas.edu> Date: 17 Jun 89 01:54:50 GMT Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 29