Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #29723Re: Technical word processing
From: Jeff Meyer
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 1988 17:42
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 1988 17:42
18 lines
1370 bytes
1370 bytes
In article <985@actnyc.UUCP> rmf@actnyc.UUCP (Robert M. Fuhrer) writes:
>Incidentally, can anyone with FWP/Word experience confirm Jeff Meyer's
>assessment in a previous posting of FWP's better handling of graphics and
>Word's better handling of tables? Since my target is technical documents,
>it seems that FWP would do better if that was the case (I expect I will
>end up using more graphics than tables)...
Remember, that was a preview of Word *4.0*, not 3.02; 4.0 will probably not
be out until September or October.
If men could get pregnant, abortion would
be a sacrament.
---
Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
INTERNET: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM
Manual UUCP: {uw-beaver, sun, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty
CREDO: You gotta be Cruel to be Kind...
<*> DISCLAIMER: Do what you want with me, but leave my employers alone! <*>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4277@fluke.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!fluke!moriartyReferences:
<985@actnyc.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!fluke!moriarty From: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Technical word processing Message-ID: <4277@fluke.COM> Date: 1 Jul 88 17:42:27 GMT References: <985@actnyc.UUCP> Sender: news@tc.fluke.COM Reply-To: moriarty@tc.fluke.COM (Jeff Meyer) Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 18