Re: LSP version ??

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #30045

#30045

From: Rich Siegel
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 1988 20:28

14 lines
900 bytes

In article <17000116@clio> brewer@clio.las.uiuc.edu writes:

>Apparently THINK likes LSC'ers more than they like
>LSP'ers :-(
>

	(Grits teeth. Says to self, "I will not swear on the net, I will
not swear on the net!")

	Bull, uh, crap. There's no favoritism towards users of either product,
it's just that tLightspeedC 3.0 got started in development first, that's all.

Rich Siegel
Symantec/THINK Technologies

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4939@husc6.harvard.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!endor!singer

References: <6173@megaron.arizona.edu> <17000116@clio>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: LSP version ??
Message-ID: <4939@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 13 Jul 88 20:28:35 GMT
References: <6173@megaron.arizona.edu> <17000116@clio>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message