Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #30060Re: MAC 88000
From: David Emberson
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 1988 16:29
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 1988 16:29
16 lines
1304 bytes
1304 bytes
At this point, I would think that the high cost of the 88000 chipset would be prohibitive for a low cost machine. Also, the Harvard architecture, while allowing reduced CPI in the absence of an on-chip I cache, requires more external components. If Apple were to do a RISC machine now, the only processors that would meet the cost constraint would probably be the LSI Logic SPARC or Mips cpus which will be available as macros, the Fujitsu SPARC, or possibly the 29K. My guess is that they will stay with 68030/40/50 for some time. Dave Emberson (dre@sun.com) p.s. The only thing that Sun controls about SPARC is the trademark. Many licensees are already designing SPARCs of all flavors on their own. Obviously we have some clout, because at the moment we are the biggest consumer of SPARC chips. But we don't (and couldn't possibly) "control" the SPARC vendors.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59913@sun.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!ucsd!ames!oliveb!sun!ember!dreReferences:
<261@hodge.UUCP> <370STORKEL@RICE> <607@riddle.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!ucsd!ames!oliveb!sun!ember!dre From: dre%ember@Sun.COM (David Emberson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: MAC 88000 Summary: Low cost RISCs Keywords: 88000 SPARC Sun Apple Mac Macintosh UNIX Message-ID: <59913@sun.uucp> Date: 14 Jul 88 16:29:31 GMT References: <261@hodge.UUCP> <370STORKEL@RICE> <607@riddle.UUCP> Sender: news@sun.uucp Lines: 16