🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <13548@apple.Apple.COM> dgold@apple.apple.com.UUCP (David Goldsmith) writes:
>System Tools 6.0 supports the Macintosh Plus, Macintosh SE, and Macintosh II.
>The current recommended system for the Macintosh 512KE is System 3.2,
>Finder 5.3.  You can attempt to use a later version, of course, but
>Apple makes no guarantees that it will work, especially if your machine
>has third party hardware upgrades.

The Macintosh System Software User's Guide Version 6.0 has a chart of
recommended system software on page 248.  The 512Ke has "happy Macs"
for System file versions 3.0, 3.2, 4.0, and 4.1.  On page 251, a table
lists System/Finder combinations for the 512Ke as 3.0/5.1, 3.2/5.3,
4.0/5.4, and 4.1/5.5.

Now "can run" doesn't mean the same things as "ought to run", so what's
the story?  I wish Apple would put more detail in the "happy face" chart:
happy, sad, ecstatic, don't care, ...  Or better, list the major new features
of each version which apply to each machine, drawbacks for each machine,
just as you list the size.  (If I had a hard disk, I wouldn't care about
file size.  If I had 2.5MB of memory I'd want MultiFinder.  If I only had
one disk drive I'd want to run the oldest Finder possible to cut down on
disk swaps...)

How about a HyperCard stack?  You tell it about your system, how much memory,
what kind of disks, network, etc., and it tells you the pros and cons of
two or three different system versions.
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My opinions are my own.  Objects in mirror are closer than they appear.
E-Mail route: ...!pyramid!garth!walter		(415) 852-2384
USPS: Intergraph APD, 2400 Geng Road, Palo Alto, California 94303
------------------------------------------------------------------------------