Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #30083512KE->2meg+SCSI owners "officially" stranded?
From: Stephen B. Baumgarten
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 1988 16:15
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 1988 16:15
48 lines
2848 bytes
2848 bytes
In article <13548@apple.Apple.COM> dgold@apple.apple.com.UUCP (David Goldsmith) writes:
>In article <460@esquire.UUCP> sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) writes:
>> 1) Does System 6.0 work on a 512KE with 3rd-party memory
>> and SCSI upgrades?
>>
>> 2) Is it *supposed* to work, or is it just chance (i.e., has Apple
>> *officially* dropped support for anything less than a Mac Plus)?
>>
>
>System Tools 6.0 supports the Macintosh Plus, Macintosh SE, and Macintosh II.
>
>The current recommended system for the Macintosh 512KE is System 3.2,
>Finder 5.3. You can attempt to use a later version, of course, but
>Apple makes no guarantees that it will work, especially if your machine
>has third party hardware upgrades.
>
>David Goldsmith Apple Computer, Inc.
>AppleLink: GOLDSMITH1 BIX: dgoldsmith 20525 Mariani Avenue, MS: 27AJ
>UUCP: {nsc,dual,sun,voder,ucbvax!mtxinu}!apple!dgold Cupertino, CA 95014
>CSNET: dgold@apple.apple.com
Well I don't see what "3rd party hardware upgrades" have to do with
it. I mean, I don't have to have APPLE memory in my Mac, do I?
The point of all this is that some of us old-timers (512KE owners who
have subsequently upgraded their machines to 2megs+SCSI for far less
than the official Apple upgrade) are concerned that Apple is no longer
supporting us.
What we would like is a *definitive* answer from someone at Apple. If
what you are saying is true, and that only the Mac Plus and above are
being supported, we'd like to know why. Memory limitations I can
understand; I never expected to be able to run MultiFinder or all the
future Apple System Software in 512K -- that's why I upgraded.
So why are we effectively stranded? While you guys "officially"
support something like the Mac Plus, which differs from my upgraded
512KE by only a couple of bytes of parameter RAM (but has only HALF as
much memory)?
I don't want to "attempt to use" a System that won't officially run on
my machine; however, if I'm going to forgo all future System Software
upgrades, I'd like (at least) to know why.
--
Steve Baumgarten | "New York... when civilization falls apart,
Davis Polk & Wardwell | remember, we were way ahead of you."
{uunet,cmcl2}!esquire!sbb | - David Letterman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<469@esquire.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!oddjob!uwvax!rutgers!cmcl2!esquire!sbbReferences:
<269@hodge.UUCP> <460@esquire.UUCP> <13548@apple.Apple.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!oddjob!uwvax!rutgers!cmcl2!esquire!sbb From: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: 512KE->2meg+SCSI owners "officially" stranded? Message-ID: <469@esquire.UUCP> Date: 11 Jul 88 16:15:05 GMT References: <269@hodge.UUCP> <460@esquire.UUCP> <13548@apple.Apple.COM> Reply-To: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) Organization: DP&W, New York, NY Lines: 47