Re: MAC 88000, or why not a Intel 386-based MAC

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #30170

#30170

From: Vincent Heuring
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 1988 20:54

13 lines
1038 bytes

In article <17556@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> jbn@glacier.UUCP (John B. Nagle) writes:
>
>     Why not a Mac based on the 386 family?  There's a 386-based Sun, after


Can you say, "Software compatibility?"  I knew you could.



-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Vince Heuring     Dep't of Electrical & Computer Engineering	|
| University of Colorado - Boulder        heuring@colorado.EDU	|
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7123@sigi.Colorado.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ncar!boulder!heuring

References: <261@hodge.UUCP> <370STORKEL@RICE> <925@garth.UUCP> <153@pitstop.UUCP> <17556@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!ncar!boulder!heuring
From: heuring@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Vincent Heuring)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: MAC 88000, or why not a Intel 386-based MAC
Message-ID: <7123@sigi.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 14 Jul 88 20:54:38 GMT
References: <261@hodge.UUCP> <370STORKEL@RICE> <925@garth.UUCP> <153@pitstop.UUCP> <17556@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>
Sender: news@sigi.Colorado.EDU
Reply-To: heuring@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Vincent Heuring)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message