Re: MAC 88000, or why not a Intel 386-based MAC

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #30193

#30193

From: Jack S. Brindle
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 1988 14:21

11 lines
914 bytes

    jbn@glacier.UUCP (John B. Nagle) writes:
>    Why not a Mac based on the 386 family?  There's a 386-based Sun, after
>    all.  Byte order would be a problem, but it can be overcome.  And the 386

Every try running 68XXX binaries on a Sun (or any other) 386 machine? I hope
Apple stays with the current brain-smart architecture!

Jack Brindle

Hmmm... Wonder if John really was making a BIG joke???

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6751@dcatla.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!gatech!dcatla!dxjsb

References: <261@hodge.UUCP> <370STORKEL@RICE> <925@garth.UUCP> <153@pitstop.UUCP> <17556@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!rutgers!gatech!dcatla!dxjsb
From: dxjsb@dcatla.UUCP (Jack S. Brindle)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: MAC 88000, or why not a Intel 386-based MAC
Message-ID: <6751@dcatla.UUCP>
Date: 15 Jul 88 14:21:12 GMT
References: <261@hodge.UUCP> <370STORKEL@RICE> <925@garth.UUCP> <153@pitstop.UUCP> <17556@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>
Reply-To: dxjsb@sunb.UUCP (Jack S. Brindle)
Organization: DCA Inc., Alpharetta, GA
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message