Re: BinHex 4.0 vs 5.0 question

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #30477

#30477

From: Lucien T. Thompson
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 1988 13:04

17 lines
1300 bytes

     Either Binhex 4.0 or 5.0 will work fine for de-binhexing files
with that header.  If you are having problems, try stripping headers
and footers, and/or removing the blank line between that message and the
actual encoded file.
     
     As far as Kermit goes, I've always used text for downloads from our
Unix box.  Works fine...

     Have fun with 'em....

-Tres

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tres Thompson                                             ltt2p@virginia.edu
Not a student no more.............Yowsa, yowsa, yowsa, do-wah, do-wah, do...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1013@virginia.acc.virginia.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!gatech!purdue!umd5!uvaarpa!virginia!mendel.acc.Virginia.EDU!ltt2p

References: <2142@alliant.Alliant.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!bellcore!rutgers!gatech!purdue!umd5!uvaarpa!virginia!mendel.acc.Virginia.EDU!ltt2p
From: ltt2p@mendel.acc.Virginia.EDU (Lucien T. Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: BinHex 4.0 vs 5.0 question
Summary: Both will work for de-hexing
Keywords: BinHex question
Message-ID: <1013@virginia.acc.virginia.edu>
Date: 25 Jul 88 13:04:39 GMT
References: <2142@alliant.Alliant.COM>
Sender: acc@virginia.acc.virginia.edu
Reply-To: ltt2p@mendel.acc.Virginia.EDU (Lucien T. Thompson)
Organization: Academic Computing Center, University of Va.
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message