Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #31694Re: StuffIt 1.5 vs. 1.40B
From: Dan Lulue
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1988 16:09
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1988 16:09
19 lines
1426 bytes
1426 bytes
In article <24684@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA>, mkhaw@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA (Mike Khaw) writes: > If I were using StuffIt for my personal benefit, I have no problems paying > the very reasonable sum of $20 for such a great utility, but in all good > conscience I can't install a shareware utility on the machines at work, > not knowing how many people are going to make use of it (I would think each > regular user of a shareware utility should feel obliged to ante up > the money, even if they all run it on the same machine, no?). > > The whole shareware concept needs clearer definition, what with networks > and file servers and whatnot. I agree. The situation is even more difficult if you work for the government. It is apparently very difficult, or even impossible to arrange payment to an individual. I would like to include some useful shareware utilities on the starter diskettes we hand out to our users, but there is no way to compensate the authors every time we hand one out. Dan.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<394@manta.NOSC.MIL>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!manta!lulueReferences:
<53@bridge2.UUCP> <24684@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!manta!lulue From: lulue@manta.NOSC.MIL (Dan Lulue ) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: StuffIt 1.5 vs. 1.40B Summary: This raises a very important point. Message-ID: <394@manta.NOSC.MIL> Date: 30 Aug 88 16:09:26 GMT References: <53@bridge2.UUCP> <24684@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA> Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation Lines: 18