Re: The Missing LINK of LSC 3.0?!

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #32801

#32801

From: Rich Siegel
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 1988 16:55

22 lines
1407 bytes

In article <1340@thumper.bellcore.com> pff@thumper.bellcore.com (Peter Ferris) writes:
>                                                             
>"Bullseye", etc; etc; don't run and neither does anything else.  I figured 
>it's probably trivial and not worth the call to Think, it was easier to try
>the net first?  Any takers on this prob?  I'd think it refreshingly easy
>in comparison to some questions / probs I've seen lately!

	What symbols are multiply defined or undefined? It's an important
piece of information that needs to be provided...

		R.

Rich Siegel
Staff Software Developer
THINK Technologies Division, Symantec Corp.
Internet: singer@endor.harvard.edu
UUCP: ..harvard!endor!singer
Phone: (617) 275-4800 x305

Any opinions stated in this article do not necessarily reflect the views
or policies of Symantec Corporation or its employees.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <423@husc6.harvard.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!ukma!nrl-cmf!ames!husc6!endor!singer

References: <1340@thumper.bellcore.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!ukma!nrl-cmf!ames!husc6!endor!singer
From: singer@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: The Missing LINK of LSC 3.0?!
Keywords: LSC, LINK, FAILURE, FRUSTRATION
Message-ID: <423@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 2 Oct 88 16:55:24 GMT
References: <1340@thumper.bellcore.com>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: singer@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message