🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9937@cup.portal.com> Mark_Peter_Cookson@cup.portal.com writes:
>Just to throw in my 2 cents here, I just finshed backing up my 140 meg Jasmine
>with Redux 1.01 after I restored it with FastBack after, I beleive, the latest
>SUM bug fix trashed the HD so bad that even SUM could not bring it back....
>
>Well, Redux is VERY nice, and A LOT more powerful than FastBack 1.02, but, and
>this a big but when it comes to backing up, the same HD (obviousy, and all the
>same files) took Redux THREE HOURS!!! to backup.  The same HD took FastBack
>88 minutes....  Quite a difference.  I should also point out that Redux took
>102 disks to FastBack's 123 (including catalog disk).  Looks like FastBack is
> ...

	But what's 21 disks when it comes to time and information.  For those
of us who Join a User Group large enough to have a store with generic disk, the
price per disk is as low as $1.05.  Is < $23 worth the hour and a half you will
save using FastBack?.  

Bruce Hoof
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: I am not attached to any organization.  I am just a poor student
		getting through school. Hopefully soon.

-----------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
     		  Bruce Hoof | uunet  \                  hoofb@psu-cs   (LOCAL)
    Computer Science Student | ucbvax  }!tektronix!psu-cs!hoofb          (UUCP)
Portland State University CS | gatech /              hoofb@cs.pdx.edu   (CSNET)
Portland Center for Advanced | ihnp4 /  hoofb%cs.pdx.edu@relay.cs.net (ARPANET)
-----------------------------+-------------------------------------------------