Re: DiskTimer II results for verious disks wanted.

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #33591

#33591

From: Alexis Rosen
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 1988 10:06

10 lines
953 bytes

I suggest that if you want to get really good numbers, we should all use
SCSI Evaluator instead of DiskTimer II. It corrects many flaws in DiskTimer
II's methodology, and I am not aware of any problems with it.

----
Alexis Rosen                       alexis@dasys1.UUCP  or  alexis@ccnysci.UUCP
Writing from                       {allegra,philabs,cmcl2}!phri\
The Big Electric Cat                                       uunet!dasys1!alexis
Public UNIX                           {portal,well,sun}!hoptoad/

Technical Details

Message-ID: <945@ccnysci.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!rutgers!cmcl2!rocky8!cucard!ccnysci!alexis

References: <910@taux01.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!rutgers!cmcl2!rocky8!cucard!ccnysci!alexis
From: alexis@ccnysci.UUCP (Alexis Rosen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: DiskTimer II results for verious disks wanted.
Message-ID: <945@ccnysci.UUCP>
Date: 23 Oct 88 10:06:34 GMT
References: <910@taux01.UUCP>
Reply-To: alexis@ccnysci.UUCP (Alexis Rosen)
Distribution: comp
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message