Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #33836DiskTimer II vs. SCSI Evaluator
From: Peter Colby
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1988 14:38
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1988 14:38
20 lines
1516 bytes
1516 bytes
In article <16@eplrx7.UUCP> lad@eplrx7.UUCP (lad) writes:
>If you're looking to compare the performance of SCSI disks Disktimer is NOT
>the way to do it. Disktimer ... it favors disks with a 1:1 interleave and it's
>results do not reflect real-world disk performance.
>
>If you want to fairly evaluate SCSI disk performance use SCSI Evaluator. It
>doesn't play favorites and you can trust the data it comes up with, to a point.
>
> Lawrence A. Deleski
Even with its problems, Disktimer II has two major advantages:
1) Its free
2) There are published results for a large variety of Hard Disks
If SCSI Evaluator is so wonderfull how do we get hold of it????
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
UUCP: {sun,decvax,linus}!cvbnet!pcolby ||| "We has met the enemy and he is us."
UUCP: pcolby@robbie.prime.com ||| Pogo
CSNET: pcolby@robbie.prime.com |||
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<317@cvbnet2.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!husc6!linus!raybed2!cvbnet2!robbie!pcolbyReferences:
<910@taux01.UUCP> <16@eplrx7.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!yunexus!geac!syntron!jtsv16!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!husc6!linus!raybed2!cvbnet2!robbie!pcolby From: pcolby@robbie.prime.com (Peter Colby) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: DiskTimer II vs. SCSI Evaluator Summary: The Benchmark Wars!!! Message-ID: <317@cvbnet2.UUCP> Date: 27 Oct 88 14:38:41 GMT Article-I.D.: cvbnet2.317 References: <910@taux01.UUCP> <16@eplrx7.UUCP> Sender: postnews@cvbnet2.UUCP Reply-To: pcolby@robbie.UUCP (Peter Colby) Organization: Computervision - a division of Prime Computer Lines: 19