🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <945@ccnysci.UUCP> alexis@ccnysci.UUCP (Alexis Rosen) writes:
>
>I suggest that if you want to get really good numbers, we should all use
>SCSI Evaluator instead of DiskTimer II. It corrects many flaws in DiskTimer
>II's methodology, and I am not aware of any problems with it.
>
>----
I'm game.  Can you post it?  If it's not too big I would prefer that you
posted it directely to this group rather than to the comp.binaries.mac
group as it will arrive a few months earlier..  I will still collect the
DiskTimer II results and publish them.  If results from this new program
start flowing in within a week, I will delay for two extra weeks and publish
them all at once.

As a side note.  Please don't expect personal replies from me to your letters
as my mailer is VERY brain damaged.  It rarely reaches anyone (except, lucky
me, news).  If it's very important, mail it to RPR1YOS@TECHNION.BITNET and I
will try to answer from there (slower).
-- 
Yossie Silverman                                   What did the Caspian sea?
National Semiconductor Ltd. (Israel)				- Saki
UUCP: taux01!yossie@nsc.UUCP
NSA LSD FBI KGB PCP CIA MOSAD NUCLEAR MI5 SPY ASSASSINATE SDI -- OOCLAY ITAY