Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #34008Word Processing. Why the silence?
From: Todd Heatherton
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 1988 03:16
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 1988 03:16
20 lines
1552 bytes
1552 bytes
I read with interest the discussion that centered around the different properites of FullWrite, Word 3.0x and WordPerfect. There appeared to be a fair amount of enthusiasm for many packages. I've noticed that the most recent McUser chooses WriteNow 2.0 as the best word processor (although, I would concede that the specific author chose WriteNow as the best package for themselves personally). I have been using WriteNow because no-one has managed to convinve me that the other packages were worth the effort. However, I would hope that others have chosen different word processors for their specific needs. Why did discussion of word processors dry up? Is there a consensus as to the 'Net users" preferred word processing package? Which is best and why? I would be interested in seeing more about word processors discussed on the net (and, of course, if others disagree this topic can dry up quite quickly!) -- ************************************************************************ heath@gpu.utcs.edu or psyc.utoronto.edu!heath No disclaimer since nobody really cares what I think ************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1988Nov4.221606.20356@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!heathShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Checksum: 06005 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!heath From: heath@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu (Todd Heatherton) Date: Fri, 4-Nov-88 22:16:06 EST Message-ID: <1988Nov4.221606.20356@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> Organization: University of Toronto Computing Services Subject: Word Processing. Why the silence? Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Keywords: Best, Worst, Reviews, etc...