Re: Macintosh mail utilities

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #34087

#34087

From: Stephen B. Baumgarten
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 1988 22:40

17 lines
1152 bytes

In article <256@merlin.bhpmrl.oz> ianh@merlin.bhpmrl.oz (Ian Hoyle) writes:
>Could someone please shed some light on the pros and cons of Macintosh mail
>utilities ? The two that I am considering are Microsoft Mail and CE Software's
>QuickMail.

Question:  What's the difference between a dog and Microsoft Mail?
Answer:    A dog barks.

Everything I've heard about QuickMail has been good; also, you might
look into InBox.  QuickMail is very much cheaper, though, and I suspect
it's probably better as well.

-- 
   Steve Baumgarten             | "New York... when civilization falls apart,
   Davis Polk & Wardwell        |  remember, we were way ahead of you."
   cmcl2!esquire!sbb            | 
   esquire!sbb@cmcl2.nyu.edu    |                           - David Letterman

Technical Details

Message-ID: <785@esquire.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!cmcl2!esquire!sbb

References: <256@merlin.bhpmrl.oz>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!cmcl2!esquire!sbb
From: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Macintosh mail utilities
Message-ID: <785@esquire.UUCP>
Date: 6 Nov 88 22:40:03 GMT
References: <256@merlin.bhpmrl.oz>
Reply-To: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten)
Organization: DP&W, New York, NY
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message