Re: Why won't/doesn't Apple support MacinTalk???

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #34801

#34801

From: Kent Borg
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1988 15:02

17 lines
997 bytes

In article <71150@felix.UUCP> kehr@felix.UUCP (Shirley Kehr) writes:
...
>OK - Here's my 2 cents worth.  I'm in favor of Macintalk support.
...
>things. How about learning another language?  How about time notes in
...
>Shirley Kehr

Speach synthesis tools are very bad for learning languages.  Macintalk
is currently specific to English, and even at that would be a VERY bad
example for how to speak English.  Somehow speaking English the way
Macintalk does does not seem very desirable for a human.

Kent Borg
kent@lloyd.uucp
or
hscfvax!lloyd!kent

Technical Details

Message-ID: <265@lloyd.camex.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!husc6!lloyd!kent

References: <6135@zodiac.UUCP> <71150@felix.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!husc6!lloyd!kent
From: kent@lloyd.camex.uucp (Kent Borg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Why won't/doesn't Apple support MacinTalk???
Summary: not good for learning languages
Message-ID: <265@lloyd.camex.uucp>
Date: 23 Nov 88 15:02:35 GMT
References: <6135@zodiac.UUCP> <71150@felix.UUCP>
Reply-To: kent@lloyd.UUCP (Kent Borg)
Organization: Camex, Inc., Boston, Mass USA
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message