Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #3508Re: Moire seems "herky-jerky" now...
From: Larry Rosenstein
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1989 16:33
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1989 16:33
20 lines
1376 bytes
1376 bytes
In article <45133334.1a5bf@moth.engin.umich.edu>
mystone@caen.engin.umich.edu (Dean Yu) writes:
> don't get as much time. For all intents and purposes, screen savers
work as
> background applications. So in short, Finder and Word 4.0 aren't giving
> enough time to background applications.
I haven't looked at Moire, but based on my experiences with the screen
saver I wrote, I would say that the problem is exactly the opposite. Most
screen savers seem to hook into GetNextEvent (or the GetnextEvent hook)
which isn't called as often if the frontmost application called
WaitNextEvent and sleeps. So I think the problem is that the Finder and
Word 4.0 are being good citizens and giving background applications the
maximum CPU time. The result is that GetNextEvent isn't called as often.
Larry Rosenstein, Apple Computer, Inc.
Object Specialist
Internet: lsr@Apple.com UUCP: {nsc, sun}!apple!lsr
AppleLink: Rosenstein1
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3866@internal.Apple.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!Apple.COM!lsrReferences:
<17218@ut-emx.UUCP> <45133334.1a5bf@moth.engin.umich.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!brutus.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!Apple.COM!lsr From: lsr@Apple.COM (Larry Rosenstein) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Moire seems "herky-jerky" now... Message-ID: <3866@internal.Apple.COM> Date: 24 Aug 89 16:33:36 GMT Sender: usenet@Apple.COM Organization: Objects-R-Us, Apple Computer, Inc. Lines: 20 References: <17218@ut-emx.UUCP> <45133334.1a5bf@moth.engin.umich.edu>