Re: Lightspeed Pascal 20

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #36770

#36770

From: James M. Moore
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 1989 17:35

12 lines
882 bytes

In article <3537@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> lgdemichillie@ucdavis.edu (Greg DeMichillie) writes:
>I am thoroughly convinced that if it weren't for the efforts of Rich
>Siegel, Symantec would have lost every customer it had on the net. 

I must say that I never had any problems with Symantec with the upgrades
from 2.x to 3.x LSC.

-- 
** James Moore **
** Internet:  jamesm@sco.com **
** uucp:  {decvax!microsoft | uunet | ucbvax!ucscc | amd}!sco!jamesm **
** Nil clu no suim ar bith ag SCO ceard a bhfuil me ag scriobh anois. **

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1412@viscous.sco.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!sco!jamesm

References: <3537@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!sco!jamesm
From: jamesm@sco.COM (James M. Moore)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Lightspeed Pascal 20
Message-ID: <1412@viscous.sco.COM>
Date: 26 Jan 89 17:35:09 GMT
References: <3537@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>
Reply-To: jamesm@sco.COM (James M. Moore)
Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc.
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message