🚀 go-pugleaf

I got some interesting comments on Interleaf in the mail.

First one should remember that the price tag is $2,495.

My impression is that Interleaf is good for what it is designed
for in the first place, namely *typesetting*.

As a program to generate what is supposed to be typeset, in other
words *technical wordprocessing*, Interleaf seems to be rather
inferior.

This is best expressed by Steve Leeke (leeke@mips.csc.ti.com):

> I've used ILP quite a bit and there are several things it can not do
> and for those reasons I use LaTeX (by using Textures) on the Mac.  ILP
> on the Mac has no automatic foonotes or endnotes.  It has no built-in
> bibliography support and no built-in equation building. 
> 
> It is the premier tool for publishing, but at a price of not
> supporting some basic complex document attributes.

Then there are lots of interesting vaporware we all hope for. But
since the frustration might be to severe, I exclude any report on
that.

Hans Aberg