🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1975@tank.uchicago.edu> ra_robert@gsbacd.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <41a2364a.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu>, billkatt@sol.engin.umich.edu (billkatt) writes...
>[...]
>>because you will
>>need all new applications to run under the new system.  Therefore, you might
>>as well compare to DOS 3.3, because it doesn't support the same overhead.
>>I am anxiously awaiting the new rewrite, even if it breaks all, as long as it
>>is in an object oriented format.
>[...]
>    
>
>_All_ new applications?  Unless they're running on a different type of CPU,
>why?

Rewriting in an object-oriented system would require changing the all the
system traps and their calling conventions.  It might be possible to write
a 'shell' which can be used to launch old-style applications, but at reduced
speed and or functionality.

+----------------------+----------------------------------------------------+
| Steve Bollinger      | Internet: billkatt@caen.engin.umich.edu            |
| 4297 Sulgrave Dr.    +------+---------------------------------------------+
| Swartz Creek, Mi. 48473     | "My employer doesn't take my opinion any    |
+-----------------------------+  more seriously than you do."               |
| "You remember the IIe, it   +---------------------------------------------+
| was the machine Apple made before they decided people didn't need         |
| machines with big screens, color, or slots."                              |
|                                 - Harry Anderson (from NBC's Night Court) |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+