🚀 go-pugleaf

There is something I don't understand.  How can Apple Records be accusing
Apple Computer of making music synthesizig deviced?  Even a mac fully equipped
with MIDI is not a synthesizer.  It only provides the digital information to
drive a synthesizer.

If they consider it a synth because of its own sound chip, then the Apple II
could have been considered a synth and then they should have sued in 1976 or
whenever the Apple II Integer first appeared.

Oh well, let's see how long this one lingers around in the courts.


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-\ --- /=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
BITNET: gmw1@cunixc                  \\*// Gabe Wiener
INTERNET: gmw1@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu \|/  1410 John Jay Hall
COMPUSERVE: 72355,1226                />\  Columbia University
WUI: 650-117-9118                    / < \ New York, NY 10027    U.S.A.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-/  >  \=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
*** Message from daemon@cunixd ***  >  |  <"At times it wiser to remain silent 
Lo! The end of the world is nigh!   >-----< and be considered a fool than to 
Please log off.			    > --- < speak and remove all doubt." -Shaw
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=->  -  <=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-