Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #38892Re: The Beatles sue Apple
From: thompson
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 1989 04:45
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 1989 04:45
46 lines
2862 bytes
2862 bytes
/* Written Feb 27, 1989 by kurtzman@pollux.usc.edu in comp.sys.mac */
>
>Doesn't matter what you can tell. If Steve Jobs had been enamored of another
>fruit there would be no lawsuit. The fact is that the Beatles owned the word
>"Apple" as a trademark. And don't think that the original Apple founders didn't
>consider the benefit of the subtle, subconscious association with the Beatles.
a. I find it hard to believe that Jobs and Wozniak, in 1978, sat down
and said, "and what's more, it'll remind people of the Beatles!!"
b. I *really* find it hard to believe that a person or company can
trademark a common English word like "apple" and have exclusive use
to that word in all cases. Even though Parker Bros. owns the
rights to "Monopoly", they cannot stop someone selling a book
called "Monopoly". They *can* stop someone from selling a *game*
called "Monopoly". Likewise, although Marvel Comics publishes
a regular comic called "Wolverine", they do *not* have to
pay royalties to the University of Michigan (nor vice versa).
Apple Records may have the trademark on the name *in the music
publishing business*, but that hardly applies to computers.
And Apple Computer is not publishing music. I don't see where
any lawsuit comes in. I suppose they're trying to fudge the
line by saying that *anything* having to *do* with music
infringes on Apple Records' trademark, but that's silly. That's
like Marvel suing U of M, because Michigan prints magazines
about the Wolverines, and that's publishing.
A more concrete example of the above: Marvel publishes a "Punisher"
comic book. But the folks who do the "Punisher" pulp novels
can't/won't touch them, because:
1. it's a different Punisher (not the same character)
2. it's a different medium
3. there is no reason for confusion of the two (and as I understand
it, that *is* one of the criteria for trademark infringement).
And I would say that more people are aware of Apple Computer than
are aware of the Apple record label. And I do not see even the
slightest chance of anyone confusing the two.
- Mark Thompson "The University Neither Knows Nor
released on my own recognizance Cares What I Am Saying -- Lucky
from a Hell of my own device Them."
University of Illinois at U-C
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<46700106@uxf.cso.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxg.cso.uiuc.edu!uxf.cso.uiuc.edu!thompsonReferences:
<1250@husc6.harvard.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxg.cso.uiuc.edu!uxf.cso.uiuc.edu!thompson From: thompson@uxf.cso.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: The Beatles sue Apple Message-ID: <46700106@uxf.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 6 Mar 89 04:45:00 GMT References: <1250@husc6.harvard.edu> Lines: 46 Nf-ID: #R:husc6.harvard.edu:1250:uxf.cso.uiuc.edu:46700106:000:2336 Nf-From: uxf.cso.uiuc.edu!thompson Mar 5 22:45:00 1989