Imagewriter LQ

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #38999

#38999

From: Ronald A. Guest
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 1989 22:39

14 lines
1164 bytes

I am looking for a low cost alternative for high(er) quality output.  The
Imagewriter II's quality isn't good enough and the laser printers (even the
non-postscript ones) cost a lot more than either the II or the LQ.  I have
heard that the early LQ/software was very bad.  The application I have in
mind is mainly printing letters/memorandum.  But a small amount of Draw and
Paint type stuff is also done.  My question is whether or not the LQ works
well enough to use in this type of environment.  E-mail responses would be
fine.
Thanks,

Ronald A. Guest, Supervisor     cosmos@druhi.ATT.COM  or  att!druhi!cosmos
AT&T Bell Laboratories          <--- but these are my thoughts, not theirs
12110 N. Pecos St.              Denver, Colorado 80234          (303) 538-4896

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3980@druhi.ATT.COM>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!rutgers!att!mtuxo!mtgzy!mtgzz!drutx!druhi!cosmos

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!rutgers!att!mtuxo!mtgzy!mtgzz!drutx!druhi!cosmos
From: cosmos@druhi.ATT.COM (Ronald A. Guest)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Imagewriter LQ
Message-ID: <3980@druhi.ATT.COM>
Date: 8 Mar 89 22:39:59 GMT
Distribution: comp
Organization: AT&T, Denver, CO
Lines: 14