Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #39013Re: SuperPaint 2.0 impressions...
From: Robert Rubinoff
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1989 17:10
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 1989 17:10
14 lines
1160 bytes
1160 bytes
In article <21373@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> steve@violet.berkeley.edu (Steve Goldfield) writes: >SuperPaint 2.0 is 516,017 bytes. >SuperPaint 1.0 was 165,034 bytes. >However, the suggested memory size has increased from 582K to >700K. Although I would expect that you could cut down a little on the required memory by getting rid of any plug-in tools and commands that you aren't using. There are a lot of them that are cute but not very important (like the ones that sprinkle stars or bubbles or various other things around the picture). This still won't make the application file any smaller, of course. Robert
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8661@netnews.upenn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!linc.cis.upenn.edu!rubinoffReferences:
<5952@bsu-cs.UUCP> <9799@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <21373@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!linc.cis.upenn.edu!rubinoff From: rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Rubinoff) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: SuperPaint 2.0 impressions... Message-ID: <8661@netnews.upenn.edu> Date: 9 Mar 89 17:10:40 GMT References: <5952@bsu-cs.UUCP> <9799@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <21373@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu Reply-To: rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu.UUCP (Robert Rubinoff) Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 14