Re: Shouldn't StuffIt implement atob/btoa?

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #39055

#39055

From: jeffrey templon
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1989 05:09

6 lines
596 bytes

	Count my vote as yes.  I didn't know about this unix utility,
but I have thought of the irony of stuffing a program, only to bloat
it by binhexing.

				jt

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3406@silver.bacs.indiana.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!silver!templon

References: <604@tekno.chalmers.se>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!silver!templon
From: templon@silver.bacs.indiana.edu (jeffrey templon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Shouldn't StuffIt implement atob/btoa?
Message-ID: <3406@silver.bacs.indiana.edu>
Date: 10 Mar 89 05:09:22 GMT
References: <604@tekno.chalmers.se>
Reply-To: templon@silver.UUCP (jeffrey templon)
Organization: Indiana University BACS, Bloomington
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message