🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7534@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> mha@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu (Mark H. Anbinder) writes:
>What I want to know is, has anyone SEEN the thing?  USED IT, maybe?  I'd
>like some information on how good it is.  It costs in the $500+ range, I
>think, and while that's more than twice the cost of the ThunderScan, it's
>less than half most other scanners' costs.  Also, it's faster than the
>ThunderScan -- you just run it across the page and you're done.

A friend saw a demo of this at MacWorld; his comment was that it scanned
things nicely, but you had to move your hand v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y to get a
clear scan from it.  A very appealing product, though -- I've thought about
getting it myself...

                           "Artistic growth is, more than it is anything else,
                            a refining of the sense of truthfulness.  The
                            stupid believe that to be truthful is easy; only
                            the artist, the great artist, knows how difficult
                            it is."
                                           -- Willa Cather
---
                                        Moriarty, aka Jeff Meyer
INTERNET:     moriarty@tc.fluke.COM
Manual UUCP:  {uw-beaver, sun, hplsla, thebes, microsoft}!fluke!moriarty
CREDO:        You gotta be Cruel to be Kind...
<*> DISCLAIMER: Do what you want with me, but leave my employers alone! <*>