Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #39814Re: 16Mhz why in the world....
From: Dean Yu
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1989 23:13
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1989 23:13
47 lines
3103 bytes
3103 bytes
In article <430095@hpcea.CE.HP.COM> twakeman@hpcea.CE.HP.COM (Teriann Wakeman) writes:
>Anyone know why Apple is bothering with 16Meg 68030s?????????
>The result is essentually a MacII with a cheaper upgrade path. All the timing
>comparisons I have seen show Mac SE/30 / IIx / IIcx to be in the same speed
>league as the Mac II.
>
> [.....]
>
>Why in the world didn't the SE/30 & IIcx come out with 33Mhz 68030s??????
>What about a second processor to handle the screen?? Third party
>manufacturers seem to be able to build 33Mhz 68030 accellerator boards that
>work with the newer Macs using Mac software. Why does Apple's R&D hesitate
>where companies with comparitively pico R&D budgets can do it?????
>
From what I understand, there are a few reasons why Apple hasn't gone with
a faster clock rate.
- Faster clock rates require faster RAM memory. And the price of
of are ungodly. If people are complaining about Apple's prices
now, think of how much they would charge for a machine with <100ns
memory chips.
- The circuit boards in the current Macs aren't capable of handling
the increased speed. I'm not an hardware expert, so I don't know
why this is so, and how the 3rd party accelerators work, but I'm
led to believe that it would require a complete redesign of the
logic board to support at faster processor.
- Upgrades. If the second reason is true, then Apple wouldn't
be able to offer upgrades (II -> IIx and SE -> SE/30). Apple
didn't offer an upgrade for the Plus to the SE because they
redesigned the logic board to get that 10 to 15% speed increase.
I suppose that if they came out with a Mac IIex or whatever that
ran at 33Mhz, they wouldn't give you an upgrade option either.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dean Yu | E-mail: mystone@{sol,caen}.engin.umich.edu
University of Michigan | Real-mail: Dean Yu
Computer Aided Engineering Network | 2413 Kelsey House
===================================| 600 E Madison
"These are MY opinions." (My | Ann Arbor, MI 48109
employer doesn't want them. |===========================================
Actually, they don't really care |
what I think. But President | This space intentionally left blank.
Duderstadt does...) |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<42340b22.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!sol.engin.umich.edu!mystoneReferences:
<430095@hpcea.CE.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!caen.engin.umich.edu!sol.engin.umich.edu!mystone From: mystone@sol.engin.umich.edu (Dean Yu) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: 16Mhz why in the world.... Message-ID: <42340b22.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu> Date: 23 Mar 89 23:13:00 GMT References: <430095@hpcea.CE.HP.COM> Sender: netnews@caen.engin.umich.edu Reply-To: mystone@sol.engin.umich.edu (Dean Yu) Organization: Computer Aided Engineering Network, University of Michigan Lines: 47