Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #39854Re: Mac pricing and the future of the Mac
From: Kelvin Thompson
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1989 18:44
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 1989 18:44
45 lines
2908 bytes
2908 bytes
In article <11346@ut-emx.UUCP>, mentat@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Robert Dorsett) writes:
|
| > The Macintosh was originally sold as a CONCEPT--with neither the
| > software or hardware being adequate to support that concept.
| >
| >Bullshit. Nothing is sold as a concept (aside, perhaps, from real
| >estate scams :-)). The Mac was and is sold as a product. There was
| >and is a concept behind the product, and that concept *still* isn't
| >fully realized, but that's a separate issue.
|
| No, NOT bullshit, Amanda. The TRUTH. The Macintosh was marketed on its
| concept. I have dozens of magazine articles, ranging from the Wall Street
| Journal to St. Mac, which make a great deal of the CONCEPT of the Macintosh.
| I must emphasize this point, since the architecture itself was not usable--
| certainly not by PC standards. If Apple's own marketing figures are to be
| believed, at least 100,000 users were stuck with using MacWrite, MultiPlan,
| Habadex, and MS-BASIC for at least nine months--and it actually took as long
| as a year and a half to get some good software.
Well, I was one of those 100,000 users and I found it "useable," whether
or not by "PC standards". I used a Mac 128 with two floppy drives and an
an Imagewriter to do a 100-page, 20-figure Masters thesis. True, I had
to partition the thesis into 7-page segments, I eventually had to
give up on merging graphics into MacWrite, and I had to do a lot of
floppy swapping and waiting on Finder.... It certainly would have been
nice to have done it a few years later on a Mac II with a hard disk and
MultiFinder, but I had an October 1984 deadline. Given the constraints --
fall of 1984, writing a thesis (with figures), my spending power -- the
Mac 128 was the best thing around. (Plus I had MacTerminal and a modem.)
Screw whatever "concepts" the ads had, the machine was worth the money.
| To this day, I have difficulty understanding why the Mac 128 was not
| released with at least a high-speed hard disk interface.
I have no difficulty: Apple had to make some design and marketing
compromises. The same reason it had 128K instead of 512K of RAM.
| Robert Dorsett
| Internet: mentat@walt.cc.utexas.edu
| UUCP: ...cs.utexas.edu!walt.cc.utexas.edu!mentat
--
-- Kelvin Thompson, Lone Rider of the Apocalypse
kelvin@cs.utexas.edu {...,uunet}!cs.utexas.edu!kelvin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5091@cs.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!kelvinReferences:
<12101@reed.UUCP> <1082@lts.UUCP> <11317@ut-emx.UUCP> <1084@lts.UUCP> <11346@ut-emx.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!kelvin From: kelvin@cs.utexas.edu (Kelvin Thompson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Mac pricing and the future of the Mac Summary: it *was* a useful product Message-ID: <5091@cs.utexas.edu> Date: 24 Mar 89 18:44:16 GMT References: <12101@reed.UUCP> <1082@lts.UUCP> <11317@ut-emx.UUCP> <1084@lts.UUCP> <11346@ut-emx.UUCP> Distribution: usa Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 45