Re: NISUS wordprocessor

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #40367

#40367

From: Dennis Cohen
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 1989 14:48

17 lines
1004 bytes

In article <90377@felix.UUCP> kehr@felix.UUCP (Shirley Kehr) writes:
> 
> The reviews I've seen (here?) basically point out that it is superior for
> manipulating words, especially doing search/replace. But Word is superior
> for final layout of pages. For example, I beleive I read that NISUS does
> not have headers and footers yet.
>

Just as a point of information, NISUS has headers, footers, indexing, and
TOC generation.  What it doesn't have yet is footnoting.


-- 
Dennis Cohen
Claris Corp.
------------
Disclaimer:  Any opinions expressed above are _MINE_!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9495@claris.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!claris!drc

References: <882@tasis.utas.oz> <90377@felix.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!claris!drc
From: drc@claris.com (Dennis Cohen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: NISUS wordprocessor
Message-ID: <9495@claris.com>
Date: 5 Apr 89 14:48:27 GMT
References: <882@tasis.utas.oz> <90377@felix.UUCP>
Reply-To: drc@claris.com (Dennis Cohen)
Organization: Claris Corporation, Mountain View CA
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message