🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <22668@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>, bmug@garnet.berkeley.edu (BMUG) writes:

>In article <9586@netnews.upenn.edu> hodas@eniac.seas.upenn.edu.UUCP (Josh Hodas) writes:
>Of course, when Apple releases an OS that uses paged memory and can
>address as much memory as the CPU will allow, I think that virtual
>memory will be an intrinsic part of that System (as well as, eventually,
>interprocess communication and all the other bells, whistles, and
>buzzwords that avid readers of MacWeek have been saturated with these
>past several months).  At that point, Connectix must come up with
>a better mousetrap.
>
>One man's opinion...
>
>John Heckendorn


I read somewhere (MacWeek, I think) a comment made by someone at Connectix
to the effect that they had patented (or whatever) the Init and that, as
far as they knew, their method was the only way to do virtual memory for
the Mac OS. In other words, more legal squabling. But it sounds a little
fishy... Anyone with any ideas on this?

                   -Todd

Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, and do not represent those of
Princeton University or Apple Computer, Inc.