Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #40468Re: NISUS wordprocessor
From: Stephen B. Baumgarten
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 1989 14:56
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 1989 14:56
18 lines
1390 bytes
1390 bytes
In article <21081@santra.UUCP> jmunkki@kampi.UUCP (Juri Munkki) writes: >In some ways Nisus is superior to both Word and FullWrite, but I guess >FullWrite is better, if you have a Mac II & at least 2 MB RAM. I hope >they get the bugs out of FullWrite. Nisus seems to be pretty stable, >but it does have a few "features" (changing from inches to centimeters >doesn't immediately update the rulers!) How does Nisus perform on a Mac Plus or SE? Is it usable in 1 Meg? Can it run in a reasonably small Multifinder partition like Word can? It sounds like it might be a really good word/text processor, but if it's going to be a resource hog like Fullwrite, I'm not sure it's worth it. -- Steve Baumgarten | "New York... when civilization falls apart, Davis Polk & Wardwell | remember, we were way ahead of you." cmcl2!esquire!sbb | esquire!sbb@cmcl2.nyu.edu | - David Letterman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1134@esquire.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!hc!lanl!cmcl2!esquire!sbbReferences:
<882@tasis.utas.oz> <90377@felix.UUCP> <21081@santra.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!hc!lanl!cmcl2!esquire!sbb From: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: NISUS wordprocessor Message-ID: <1134@esquire.UUCP> Date: 7 Apr 89 14:56:11 GMT References: <882@tasis.utas.oz> <90377@felix.UUCP> <21081@santra.UUCP> Reply-To: sbb@esquire.UUCP (Stephen B. Baumgarten) Organization: DP&W, New York, NY Lines: 18