🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #40624

MacIIx or MacIIcx

#40624
From: James C O'Connor III, 2846
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1989 16:09
15 lines
1242 bytes
Okay - I am getting either a MacIIcx or a MacIIx, and I am looking for input.
The extra bucks to get the IIx is a big factor - but so is the fact that the
IIcx has its cpu soldered to the logic board, i.e. no easy cpu upgrades like for
the II.  No easy ram cache, or replacement cpu boards.  The extra 3 slots aren't
a big factor.  The smaller size of the cx and its lighter weight are nice but
not deciding factors.  Any ideas?  16MHz is a respectable speed now, but in a
few months it won't be and third parties will be offering speed-ups for the IIx,
will it be possible for the IIcx?

Also, I am concerned that I will have to wait longer for the IIcx to come in.

Thanks for any help.  Please e-mail to me:  jcocon@hazel.cs.clemson.edu (I think
that is right).  

Jim O'Connor
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5051@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!jcocon%hazel.cs.clemson.edu

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!jcocon%hazel.cs.clemson.edu
From: jcocon%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (James C O'Connor III, 2846)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: MacIIx or MacIIcx
Message-ID: <5051@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Date: 10 Apr 89 16:09:00 GMT
Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu
Reply-To: jcocon%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu
Lines: 15