Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #40855Re: Confused about SIMMs
From: Alexander Lau
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 1989 07:44
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 1989 07:44
14 lines
1119 bytes
1119 bytes
In article <6760@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> mithomas@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Michael Thomas Niehaus) writes:
>To avoid confusion, I would say to only get SIMMs that are 120ns or faster.
>The slower ones may work now, but if you ever upgrade in the future...
>
>-Michael
The rumor is that the 25 MHz stuff that Apple is putting out "real
soon now" will require 100 ns chips, and the 33 MHz stuff will require
80 ns chips. But, of course, that's only a rumor. :-)
--- Alex
UUCP: {att,backbones}!ucbvax!qal.berkeley.edu!lauac
INTERNET: lauac%qal.berkeley.edu@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
FIDONET: Alex.Lau@bmug.fidonet.org (1:161/444)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<23084@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!mead.qal.berkeley.edu!lauacReferences:
<195@xochitl.UUCP> <72@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu> <6760@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!mead.qal.berkeley.edu!lauac From: lauac@mead.qal.berkeley.edu (Alexander Lau) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Confused about SIMMs Message-ID: <23084@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 14 Apr 89 07:44:42 GMT References: <195@xochitl.UUCP> <72@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu> <6760@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: na Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 14