Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #41182Re: Price Lists, Rumors
From: BMUG
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1989 22:54
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1989 22:54
23 lines
1573 bytes
1573 bytes
In article <2160@pur-phy> sho@newton.physics.purdue.edu.UUCP (Sho Kuwamoto) writes:
>
(stuff deleted)
>Wow. Sounds cool. But they *are* keeping bitmap fonts around too, right?
>I'd hate to see what an outline generated 9 point font would look like.
(more stuff deleted)
An outline generated 9 point font could certainly look pretty bad on a
72-dpi monitor. Suppose you display it on a monitor at, say, 100 dpi,
though, and decent contrast and resolution?
Apple needs to address a lot of the 72-dpi limitations of QuickDraw
if they're to take advantage of higher-res graphic display monitors
and achieve true device independence (as PostScript is capable of
doing). Obviously this would be a very high-priority item on the
future features checklist...
John Heckendorn
/\
BMUG ARPA: bmug@garnet.berkeley.EDU A__A
1442A Walnut St., #62 BITNET: bmug@ucbgarnet |()|
Berkeley, CA 94709 | |
(415) 549-2684 | |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<23442@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!bionet!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!bmugReferences:
<6842@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <23349@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <2160@pur-phy>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!bionet!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!bmug From: bmug@garnet.berkeley.edu (BMUG) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Price Lists, Rumors Message-ID: <23442@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: 21 Apr 89 22:54:20 GMT References: <6842@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <23349@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <2160@pur-phy> Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 23