Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #41214Re: II ==> IIx conversions
From: Mike Bell
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1989 12:59
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1989 12:59
73 lines
3107 bytes
3107 bytes
In article <10148@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> flatmas@ladder.cs.orst.edu (Scott Timothy Flatman) writes:
>
> I'm thinking of upgrading my Mac II to a IIx(or beyond).
>If you have either gone the Apple upgrade route(motherboard + FDHD drive)
>or have purchased a Daystar Digital 33Mhz/030 board I would like to know
>cost, performance, and how you like the new configuration. Also if you have
>another route to a 68030 upgrade I would like to hear(see?!) from you.
>
>I will post a summary of responses.
>Thanks in advance!
>Scott Flatman ( Student at large... )
In the past several months, I have tested just about every accelerator
board on the market. Here are my results:
1. Dove
Without a ram cache, the speed improvement on a II is
about as great as going from a plus to an SE. Also, without
the rom/superdrive upgrade, you CANNOT run A/UX with this
board installed. Not a lot of improvement for $1000.
2. Daystar Digital
I bought the board in Jan., and for two months I tried to
get the thing to work with no success. Finally, two weeks ago
I demanded a refund, so they sent me a new board. After all
of that hastle, the board works very well (including with
A/UX and 32-bit QD). The ram cache really makes looping
operations fly (about 55 times faster). Still, it is pricy.
3. Siclone
I just recently got a few of these in, and the initial
indications are good. They seem compatible with just about
every application (with the exception of Applelink). We
have run into one problem -- one of the boards seems to have
a timing problem which causes the Sony driver to fail to read
a floppy. It seems slower than the Daystar board, but MacWeek
claims it is faster. It too is a bit expensive....
All in all, if you really dont need the speed, I would wait for the prices to
drop, and the manufacturers to work out all of the bugs before investing in
an accelerator card (they cost as much as a new Mac II !!).
Disclaimer: Of course, these are all my opinions, and DuPont has no idea that
I even read comp.sys.mac, let alone post to it.
********************************************************************************
Mike Bell CSnet: BELLMA%ERVX01@dupont.com
Senior Engineer Applelink: D2747
DuPont Electronic Imaging
Core Technology Group
Can YOUR mac play FOOTBALL ????
********************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10253@netnews.upenn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!bellReferences:
<10148@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!bell From: bell@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Mike Bell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: II ==> IIx conversions Keywords: Mac II, IIx,Daystar Digital 33/030 Message-ID: <10253@netnews.upenn.edu> Date: 22 Apr 89 12:59:27 GMT References: <10148@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu Reply-To: bell@eniac.seas.upenn.edu.UUCP (Mike Bell) Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 73