🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #41946

Re: Moebius patch (deprotection)

#41946
From: William M. Bumgarner
Date: Fri, 05 May 1989 01:06
20 lines
1512 bytes
> software publishers loose significant portion of sales due to piracy

I would have to disagree with this; I know of far more people who will simply
refuse to buy a package that is copy protected-- no matter how high of quality
it is.

I am one of them, but in the case of Moebius, I will keep it around because
I think I was able to make my point by dealing with company...  They know
their software's copy protection is costing them sales.  This will also
be mentioned in the review I am writing (which will also be forwarded to the
company).
There is NO reason to copy protect software; it costs the company sales,
annoys the users that try to put up with it, and disrupts normal computer
usage.  It, in no way, prevents piracy-- from the experience of knowing the
Apple II piracy world in its prime (remember the AE-Pro lines?), it was often
the case to try and spread copy-protected software as much as possible while
the non-copy-protected software was rarely distributed.

b.bum
wb1j+@andrew.cmu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <kYMDBwy00UgXIAx_FN@andrew.cmu.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!wb1j+
References: <EYMBIzy00WB9QpWmdD@andrew.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!wb1j+
From: wb1j+@andrew.cmu.edu (William M. Bumgarner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Moebius patch (deprotection)
Message-ID: <kYMDBwy00UgXIAx_FN@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 5 May 89 01:06:04 GMT
References: <EYMBIzy00WB9QpWmdD@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 20
In-Reply-To: <EYMBIzy00WB9QpWmdD@andrew.cmu.edu>