Re: New mouse design... WHY?!

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #42139

#42139

From: James Osborne
Date: Mon, 08 May 1989 20:47

9 lines
1028 bytes

When I bought my SE last year, I was surprised to find that I had the "new"
mouse.  Well, after a year of use, I decided new is not necessarily improved.
The mouse refused to track well vertically, which really rots when you have
to use menus, which is 99.9% of the time.  This happened even after I cleaned
it.  So... When my SEx box contained the nice heavy "old" mouse, I was more
than happy to give it some friendly pats.

-Jamie
"Sorry! the file '.signature' has MIGRATED. *snicker, snicker*"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13402@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!xerox

References: <7891@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <431a1e09.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!xerox
From: xerox@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (James Osborne)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: New mouse design... WHY?!
Message-ID: <13402@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Date: 8 May 89 20:47:48 GMT
References: <7891@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <431a1e09.a590@mag.engin.umich.edu>
Sender: news@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU
Reply-To: xerox@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (James Osborne)
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message