Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #42391Re: are quantum (Apple) disks bad news?
From: jth90342
Date: Wed, 10 May 1989 22:31
Date: Wed, 10 May 1989 22:31
8 lines
904 bytes
904 bytes
You have been informed wrong. I have used many Quantum drives and have been impressed with their speed and reliability. The 80Meg Quantum is probably a better bet than the 40 though, since the 80 has an on controller cache that speeds throughput. In 40 Megs, the Quantum is good, but the Conner drive is probably better... Jeff Huber jth890342@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<111900062@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jth90342References:
<4254@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jth90342 From: jth90342@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: are quantum (Apple) disks bad news? Message-ID: <111900062@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 10 May 89 22:31:00 GMT References: <4254@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> Lines: 8 Nf-ID: #R:ucdavis.ucdavis.edu:4254:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:111900062:000:368 Nf-From: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jth90342 May 10 17:31:00 1989