QuicKeys vs. Tempo vs. ???

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #42808

#42808

From: Andy J. Williams
Date: Fri, 19 May 1989 19:42

24 lines
1416 bytes

[]

I am looking to buy a macro package for the Mac and have heard plenty of
good things about QuicKeys and Tempo (I have Automac III which came with 
my Word 4.0 but its interface is really grim)  Anyway, I would like to
find out what the plusses and minuses of the two are.  I have used
QuicKeys quite a bit over the last 6 months and am aware of its quirks
and problems (needing to define keystrokes for each step in a sequence
etc).  

Since I am sure this has been around the net before, please eMail
your opinions to me.  

Thanks

-ajw




Andy J. Williams '90   |           <hello>           | ack@dartvax.dartmouth.edu
31 North Main Street   |  set $NAME='inigo_montoya'  |        Systems Programmer
Hanover NH, 03755      |     You kill -9 my ppid     | Kiewit Computation Center
603-643-2177           |        prepare to vi        |         Dartmouth College

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13540@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!ack

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!bu-cs!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!ack
From: ack@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Andy J. Williams)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: QuicKeys vs. Tempo vs. ???
Summary: Which is better?
Keywords: QuicKeys Tempo Macros
Message-ID: <13540@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU>
Date: 19 May 89 19:42:51 GMT
Sender: news@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU
Reply-To: ack@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Andy J. Williams)
Organization: Kiewit Computation Center, Dartmouth College
Lines: 24