Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #42826Is LISP viable on the Mac?
From: Chris Rosebrugh
Date: Tue, 23 May 1989 02:56
Date: Tue, 23 May 1989 02:56
22 lines
1687 bytes
1687 bytes
is there a viable LISP development system on the Mac that one can use
to create an application which isn't gigantic and slow? this isn't cynical,
i used Symbolics 3620s, 3640s, and 3650s for 3 years for development of a
product which was delivered under Franz Lisp on Apollos and vaxes, so i
love the language and the development environment (at least the Symbolics
one, Franz is pretty minimul) but not the size and speed.
i have no problem writing Lisp code to be somewhat optimized, etc. so that
it will be of decent speed and limited size, but is the Mac implementation
of Coral/Allegro CL viable for doing such work? are there other
implementations of Lisp out there that are any good? what do these cost?
do they do a decent job of hiding some of the pain of Mac development?
do they provide the wrappers for creating Mac applications? is C really
the way to go for this exercise? i just bought LightSpeed 3.01 for sport,
but, boy would i like to return to LISP!
thanks for any info.
--
Chris Rosebrugh | ...!{decwrl,sequent,tessi}!mntgfx!chrisr
Mentor Graphics Corporation | chrisr@pdx.MENTOR.COM
Beaverton, Oregon | (I'm all by myself in this one.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989May22.195611.756@mntgfx.mentor.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tektronix!sequent!mntgfx!chrisrShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!tektronix!sequent!mntgfx!chrisr From: chrisr@mntgfx.mentor.com (Chris Rosebrugh) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.lang.lisp Subject: Is LISP viable on the Mac? Keywords: LISP Macintosh development Message-ID: <1989May22.195611.756@mntgfx.mentor.com> Date: 23 May 89 02:56:09 GMT Distribution: na Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation, Beaverton Oregon Lines: 22