🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <8666@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> englandr@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Scott Englander) writes:
#>In article <24696@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> steve@violet.berkeley.edu (Steve Goldfield) writes:
#>>haven't tested it extensively but it seems not to screw
#>>up at the top of the page like my old one did. It isn't
#>
#>We're still waiting for ours.  The problem we have at the top of the
#>page is that when you go to print using manual feed (in Word), unless
#>you have a top margin of like 0 in, it will leave extra space at the
#>top.  Likewise down at the bottom -- it's as if the whole page is
#>shifted up an inch or so.  (No prob with auto feed, though).  
#>
#>Do you mean to say that it still does this?!  _PLEASE_ don't say yes.
#>-- 
#>
#>                                               - Scott

Sorry I can't answer these. I don't use Word because I can't
stand it (3.0), and I don't use manual feed on the LQ because
I have a laserprinter. I just printed out a couple of test
files. I mainly use the LQ to print continuous labels.

However, you might check the dip switch I mentioned (no. 8
on block 2) which controls where the paper is positioned
after printing. Your problem may also be caused by Word;
I don't know how it controls top margins. I think you're
going to have to wait for your LQ and answer the questions
yourself.

Steve Goldfield