Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #43056Re: LSP 2.0 Upgrade: Is it worth it?
From: Rich Siegel
Date: Thu, 25 May 1989 23:20
Date: Thu, 25 May 1989 23:20
21 lines
1198 bytes
1198 bytes
In article <1091@draken.nada.kth.se> d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte) writes:
>(i.e. a ask for a char from an odd address, the compiler fetches the
>WHOLE WORD -- odd address exception !) and it also has some signed/unsigned
The "char" data type is two bytes, not one. Thus, the whole-word
fetch. Use "SignedByte" if you want one-byte size.
--Rich
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rich Siegel
Staff Software Developer
Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group
Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel
"She told me to make myself comfortable, so I pulled down my pants
and sat in the pudding." -Emo Phillips
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1938@husc6.harvard.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bbn!husc6!endor!siegelReferences:
<1989May24.123418.5967@mntgfx.mentor.com> <1091@draken.nada.kth.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bbn!husc6!endor!siegel From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: LSP 2.0 Upgrade: Is it worth it? Keywords: LSP2.0 Pascal Programming Message-ID: <1938@husc6.harvard.edu> Date: 25 May 89 23:20:26 GMT References: <1989May24.123418.5967@mntgfx.mentor.com> <1091@draken.nada.kth.se> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA Lines: 21