Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #4316Re: Partitioning Software
From: Tim W Smith
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1989 10:25
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1989 10:25
26 lines
1419 bytes
1419 bytes
> I might get flamed for this, but there is no approved way of > getting partitions in the Mac OS. Apple hasn't rewritten the > part of the Finder that deals with volumes ever since they > wrote HFS. So? The Finder has nothing to do with partitioning. What is considered to be a disk drive by the Finder ( and everything else ) is determined by what the various disk drivers choose to stick in the drive queue and post disk insertion events for. If disk driver X sticks 4 entries in the drive queue, the Finder has no way of knowing that these are for 4 different parts of the same disk. They are 4 disks to the Finder. > > Some partitioning methods are less dangerous than others; > SUM is one of the more dangerous, while SilverLining or > MultiDisk are a couple of the least dangerous... > > --- Alex What do you see as dangerous about these various systems? Do you consider AppleShare to be dangerous? How about having multiple AppleShare volumes mounted? Tim Smith
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<22031@cup.portal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!tsReferences:
<160700059@primerd> <17003@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!ts From: ts@cup.portal.com (Tim W Smith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Partitioning Software Message-ID: <22031@cup.portal.com> Date: 10 Sep 89 10:25:13 GMT References: <160700059@primerd> <17003@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Organization: The Portal System (TM) Lines: 26