Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #43188Re: ROM's & 7.0, what good are they???
From: Jon W{tte
Date: Mon, 29 May 1989 21:00
Date: Mon, 29 May 1989 21:00
20 lines
1273 bytes
1273 bytes
--[ Line eaters are extinct, so what am I doing here ? ]--
The figures for ROM/RAM (on the Mac IIx I use at school):
ROM 256Kb
RAM 570Kb
which, with a bit reduction for fonts and DAs and such in memory (all
of them aren't) gives the ratio ROM:RAM 1:2. This gets worse when you
consider that much of the RAM OS REPLACES the Rom OS... But nowadays,
the ROM OS is on RAM SIMMS, capable of storing up to 16Mb ROM (this
comes from a TechNote) so there should be no big deal updating the
ROMs, now, sould it, Apple ? :-)
--
h+@nada.kth.se <>,, Picture this recording studio somewhere far far away
Jon W{tte (:))))=- Brrrrreeeee, you bugger! (Piano in)
Oh NO! A bug! <>'' Say kids, what time is it ? It's time for a house.
Dizco me to XtaC! OOOOH LAAAH LAAAAA ! (c) HitHouse -- No More --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1111@draken.nada.kth.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!draken!d88-jwaReferences:
<11315@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!draken!d88-jwa
From: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: ROM's & 7.0, what good are they???
Message-ID: <1111@draken.nada.kth.se>
Date: 29 May 89 21:00:34 GMT
References: <11315@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU>
Reply-To: d88-jwa@nada.kth.se (Jon W{tte)
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 19