🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2326@blake.acs.washington.edu> bolles@blake.acs.washington.edu (Spencer Bolles) writes:
>   There is now a newsgroup comp.sys.intergraph, if you haven't already 
>noticed.

Not really.

-Path: tardis!tymix!oliveb!apple!ames!lll-winken!uunet!ingr!b11!usenet
-From: usenet@b11.ingr.com (Usenet Network)
-Newsgroups: comp.sys.intergraph.ctl
-Subject: newgroup comp.sys.intergraph
-Message-ID: <5198@b11.ingr.com-
-Date: 6 Jun 89 17:58:20 GMT
-Control: newgroup comp.sys.intergraph
-Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL
-Lines: 1
-Approved: usenet@b11.ingr.com
-
-This news group is for discusions of Intergraph products.
	-----
<Path: tardis!tymix!oliveb!apple!rutgers!mailrus!cwjcc!hal.cwru.edu!edguer
<From: edguer@hal.cwru.edu (Aydin "Bif" Edguer)
<Newsgroups: comp.sys.intergraph.ctl
<Subject: rmgroup comp.sys.intergraph
<Message-ID: <360@hal.cwru.edu<
<Date: 7 Jun 89 00:58:41 GMT
<References: <5198@b11.ingr.com<
<Control: rmgroup comp.sys.intergraph
<Reply-To: edguer@hal.cwru.edu (Aydin "Bif" Edguer)
<Followup-To: news.groups
<Organization: Biometry Computing Facility
<Lines: 6
<Approved: root@hal.cwru.edu
<
<This group did not get discussed, did not get voted upon, did not appear to
<follow any of the newgroup guidelines.  It is therefore being asked to be
<removed as a show of support for all the groups who did follow the guidelines.
<Especially those who did not get approved.  If we do not force people to
<honor the guidelines for creating world-wide groups then they are so much
<waste.

I will be removing this group from my system.