Article View: comp.sys.mac
Article #4371Re: Partitioning Software
From: Alex Lau
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1989 03:09
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1989 03:09
15 lines
1180 bytes
1180 bytes
> I am no advocate of SUM either but why should the SilverLining's or
>the MultiDisk-solution be a less-dangerous one?
Because SilverLining and MultiDisk try to write the partitions into the
disk driver, as "true" SCSI partitions. The problem, of course, lies in
the Finder, not in SilverLining or MultiDisk. So when the Finder gets
re-written, those two should be the "best" way to partition.
I still don't like any partitioning, personally. I've seen it mess up
too many drives.
--- Alex
UUCP: {att,backbones}!ucbvax!franny!c8s-an
INTERNET: c8s-an%franny.berkeley.edu@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
FIDONET: Alex.Lau@bmug.fidonet.org (1:161/444)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<17078@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!pasteur!franny.Berkeley.EDU!c8s-anReferences:
<160700059@primerd> <17003@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1587@draken.nada.kth.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!pasteur!franny.Berkeley.EDU!c8s-an From: c8s-an@franny.Berkeley.EDU (Alex Lau) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Partitioning Software Message-ID: <17078@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 12 Sep 89 03:09:37 GMT References: <160700059@primerd> <17003@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1587@draken.nada.kth.se> Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU Reply-To: c8s-an@franny.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Alex Lau) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 15