Re: Macintosh and IBM systems

Article View: comp.sys.mac

Article #43723

#43723

From: Jeffrey Joseph Barbose
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1989 03:59

10 lines
682 bytes

AND...

That article fails to point out that the '386 (IBM) and the 68030 (IIx)
are NOT in the same league, processing-wise.  The '486 may be on par
with the 68030, but it isn't out yet.  When it is, Motorola will have
the '040.

IBM--yuck.

Jeff

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8YYSCqy00XcLM29HtU@andrew.cmu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!jb28+

References: <4063@merlin.usc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!jb28+
From: jb28+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jeffrey Joseph Barbose)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Macintosh and IBM systems
Message-ID: <8YYSCqy00XcLM29HtU@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 11 Jun 89 03:59:50 GMT
References: <4063@merlin.usc.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 10
In-Reply-To: <4063@merlin.usc.edu>

Reply to Parent Message